Terrorists endorse Democrats in election

Terrorists endorse Democrats in election

The Democrats have received a key endorsement: the heads of Islamic terrorist organizations in the Middle East. According to WorldNetDaily, terrorists believe the Democrats will cut and run from Iraq, giving them the victory. They claimed that a Democrat win would prove Americans are “tired” of Iraq.

They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

They said a withdrawal would also embolden their own terror groups to enhance “resistance” against Israel.

“Of course Americans should vote Democrat,” Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity, told WND.

There are times when I hope the Democrats win, just to teach Republicans a lesson about taking their base for granted and encouraging to move back to conservatism. But then I look at the War on Terror and realize that the price of such a lesson would be very high.

Laughing at Pelosi

Technorati Tags:, , , ,

  • For a few fleeting moments, I have also hoped for a victory by the democrats in this election.

    Not only would it teach the republicans a lesson, but having the democrats in charge for two years and having to put up with their nonsense would surely teach the voters a lesson also. 

    Then, I thought better of it.

    Even though GW will remain as our president, two years of a democrat congress can – and would – be so very dangerous to our society and even our lives.

    Please go out and vote folks – even if you are feeling angry or apathetic

  • US Forces were searching for a kidnapped American soldier in Baghdad.  They blockaded a large portion of the city.  Iraqi PM al-Maliki ordered the barricades down, and the US complied with this “cut and run” order.  Seems to me we’re already cutting and running in miniature, perhaps it’s time to leave.

  • Okay, I’ll try again.  Hopefully, this will be more clear.  In the interest of space here in Dom’s comments box, I’m not going to post all the links.  Those who are interested in the truth will need to dig thru the info.  I trust the Anchoress (whom I linked to up above) and Ed Morrisey of Captain’s Quarter blog (linked to below via another blogger).  Captain Ed is one of the best conservative bloggers out there, if you’re not familiar with him).

    Saturday, November 04, 2006
    The documents the New York Times just authenticated
    The Times unleashed ‘Operation Al-Qaqaa II’ yesterday, but there was teeny tiny hitch in its execution.

    In their zeal to deliver a death blow to newly resurgent Republicans, they accidentally destroyed the central thesis for attacking the Bush administration for lo these many years. You know: that Bush lied, misled, deceived, and otherwise tortured the English language, thereby hypnotizing the Democrats into believing that Saddam Hussein was a threat.

    Now the Times reveals that, why yes, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq had a mature nuclear weapons program—and documented links to global extremist terror groups—all along! Whoops!

    What follows is an illustrated guide to some of the documents that the Times has authenticated (and a huge hat tip to the indefatigable Captain Ed, who has tirelessly analyzed and organized the FMSO documents).