The headline of the story says “Ariz. Bishop Not Drunk During Hit-And-Run.” But that’s not exactly what the prosecutors are saying. “Prosecutors said there was no evidence that Bishop Thomas O’Brien was drunk….” [emphasis added]. And the reason there was no evidence was because the bishop wasn’t found until Monday morning, long after a blood-alcohol test could be administered usefully. And so prosecutors can’t charge him with it, if he had been drunk that is.