Continuing its series of articles on saints’ relics, the Boston Globe addresses the fate of altar stones removed from closed parishes. Among the problems is that a new standard for the relics literally cemented into the stones was put into place—when else?—after Vatican II. Previously the relics could be tiny chips of bone, but now the requirement is that the relic be an identifiable body part (probably for the sake of authentication), and since such large relics are rarer now, the requirement that every altar have an altar stone was rescinded. In my opinion, hoping to fix one problem, they created a bigger one.
In any case, what to do with the pile-up of stones?
After Heck retrieves an altar stone, she takes it to the archdiocese office complex in Brighton, where it is placed in the custody of chief archivist Robert Johnson-Lally . The stones are cataloged and put into storage in a climate-controlled room.
Johnson-Lally records the parish of origin for each altar stone, but records are scarce as to which saint’s relics are interred within any given piece. Most relics are embedded along with a certificate of authenticity from the Vatican, which is written in Latin and contains information on the relic itself and the church in which it was placed.
But when the documents have been sealed into an altar stone with concrete, it’s nearly impossible to take them out without destroying the stone.[...] If some other devotional use is not found for the relics, church guidelines mandate a formal burial in a Catholic cemetery. Either way, the change in practices effectively ends a tradition that originated in the earliest days of Christianity.
“The early, early, early Christians . . . celebrated the sacraments in the catacombs, on the tombs of the catacombs in Rome,” says Heck. “That was their altar surface. The sarcophagi that held the bodies or the bones of the saints in the catacombs are where they celebrated Mass.”
Technorati Tags:altars, Boston, Catholic, parish closing, relics, saints